The Management tried to persuade us that there were vast
numbers of potential students just champing at the bit to come to the college
and that the only thing preventing this massive influx of students was the
inflexibility of the existing staff.
This of course was total rubbish and it was fairly
insulting to all those outside their tight-knit clique that they should be seen
to base so much of their business strategy of this fabrication.
Increasing the workload of existing staff by about 30% (23%
via more hours per week and about 7% via more weeks per year) would greatly
reduce the number of staff required. Even if the total income coming into the
college remained static the proposed contractual changes would free up large
sums of extra money. This was the (sole) reason for the sudden burning desire
to change long-standing employment contracts.
Amazingly a small number of staff who wanted to accept
this offer. The colleague who was most strongly in favour justified her stance
on the basis that she needed the extra 3% to fund the ever-increasing cost of
child care. This remained her view until somebody pointed out how many more
hours of child care she would require per year to cover the proposed changes to
her working week. Her about face was as sudden as it was dramatic!
No comments:
Post a Comment