For the last six months I have attempting to resolve a whole series of disputes between a university student who lost both her parents in a road accident when she was in year 12 at school and her maternal grandparents. Most of the facts are not in dispute which would suggest that my job should have been fairly simple. Sadly nothing could have been further from the truth.
In truth neither side is very good at listening to what the “opposition”
is saying. The Grandfather is very dismissive of any opinions put forward by
his granddaughter or her solicitor and has fairly consistently refused to
explain why he did some of his more questionable actions. For example he
accepts that the day after his daughter and her husband were killed he went
round to their house and removed money, some jewellery and also burnt “some
papers”. He has been given many
opportunities to explain why he did this but I am fairly certain that even his
own solicitor hasn’t been told the whole story.
Clearly when the case comes to court he will have no choice
but to answer these questions so it isn’t clear to me what advantage he is
seeking to gain from his current stubborn silence.
The grandfather sounds like a piece of work. Jeez, what a sleaze!
ReplyDeleteOne would hope he would someday answer these questions. Amazing that one would grasp greedily so soon after losing one's own child. Horrible.